chimeric erbb2 fc protein (Sino Biological)
Structured Review

Chimeric Erbb2 Fc Protein, supplied by Sino Biological, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/chimeric+erbb2+fc+protein/pmc10471977-88-9-12?v=Sino+Biological
Average 95 stars, based on 2 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "ErbB2 (HER2)-CAR-NK-92 cells for enhanced immunotherapy of metastatic fusion-driven alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma"
Article Title: ErbB2 (HER2)-CAR-NK-92 cells for enhanced immunotherapy of metastatic fusion-driven alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1228894
Figure Legend Snippet: Lysis of ErbB2-positive, 2D patient-derived tumor organoid aRMS cells by parental NK-92 or NK-92/5.28.z cells. (A) ErbB2 surface expression on RMS102, RMS127 and RMS335 cells was confirmed by flow cytometry. Antigen density per cell quantified by flow cytometry is shown. (B) Cytotoxicity data of NK-92 or NK-92/5.28.z cells during short-term (3 hour) coculture with 2D patient-derived tumor organoid aRMS cells from europium release assays are given. Data of three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SD and differences were analyzed with a two-tailed Student´s t-test and were considered significant for p< 0.05 (*), p< 0.01 (**), p< 0.001 (****), p<0.0001 or ns.
Techniques Used: Lysis, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Cytotoxic capacity against ErbB2-positive 3D tumor spheroids. (A) ErbB2 surface expression on RH30 cells was confirmed by flow cytometry. (B) Expression of the anti-ErbB2-targeted CAR on NK-92/5.28.z cells was confirmed by flow cytometry. (C) Exemplary coculture images of NK-92 or NK-92/5.28.z cells added to established 3D RH30GFP/luc+ tumor spheroids on day 4 are shown. Imaging was performed on days 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10. (D) The areas with green fluorescent signals were quantified using Fiji. Data of three independent experiments are shown as mean ± SD. Differences were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA using the Bonferroni method and were considered significant for p< 0.05 (*), p< 0.01 (**) or ns.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Imaging
